Chronic SCI: (Adams et al, 2007; n = 61)
- Excellent: PSFS and SCI-SET correlations (r = -0.66)
- Adequate: PSFS and Spasticity Severity correlations (r = 0.58*)
- Excellent: PSFS and Spasticity Impact correlations (r = 0.67*)
- Poor: PSFS and FIM Motor Score correlations (r = -0.05)
- Adequate: PSFS and QLI Health and Functioning Sub scale correlations (r = -0.46*)
*p < .001
Spasticity Outcomes Review: (Hsieh et al, 2008) & Chronic SCI: (Benz et al, 2005; n = 15, C5 to T20, n = 12 ASIA A, n = ASIA B, n = 2 ASIA C, n = 1 ASIA D; age range = 22-63 years)
Spearman Rank-Order Correlation of the SCATS, AS, and PSFS | | | | | | |
| AS Hip | AS Knee | AS Ankle | SCATS Clonus | SCATS Flexion | SCATS Extension |
PSFS | .43 | .43 | .51 | .59 | .41 | .40 |
Degree | Adequate | Adequate | Adequate | Adequate | Adequate | Adequate |
* p < 0.05 | | | | | | |
Convenience Sample: (Priebe et al, 1996; n=85; sample of convenience, C3-T10 duration of injury 1 month - 25 years, all ASIA levels)
- Adequate to Poor: Correlations between self report scales (PSFS) and clinical examinations (AS, clonus, patellar tap, achilles tap, adductor tap, planter stimulation response); none were above .4 (Polychroric Correlation)